Alright, so people like to complain on different sites and this one that I have used non sequitur arguments for things I've explained on this site. First of all, let me say that I don't generally write things for this site well in advance. I don't write an essay, proof-read it, proof-read it again, and post it. That said, no one will provide an example of a faulty argument. They just like to state that I have a fault argument. In fact, regardless of an attack on the way my argument is stated (such as an "if A, not necessarily B" type of issue), no one will provide a logical problem with my argument. So, I say walk the talk if you are going to make such statements. Otherwise, don't waste anyone's time by posting here. The reason people resort to unsubstantial attacks is because they have nothing substantial (read: they are wrong). See the previous post about the forged Bush documents. How low can you go?! UPDATE: I provided my email address on the other site: nothing received. I like how Democrats gather in their little circles and try to stay in them because it allows them to convince each other they are right. Hilarious. It's a nice way to live until you find out you were all wrong.