Who was being irrational?

Written on August 3rd, 2006 by Judd

Kudos to Elisabeth Hasselbeck. I’m sure she will never know, on Earth, the amount of people that she represents and who were proud of the stance she took on ABC’s “The View” yesterday, when she stood for life. It is being said that she “loses her mind” and that she is a “right wing psycho” because she stated that life begins at conception. Barbara Walters decides that, even though the three hosts of the show were ganging up on her, that it was Hasselbeck who wasn’t having a respectful discussion (notice how the woman directly to her right keeps trying to talk over the top of her). This is a typical occurrence for those standing for life and against the “convenience” of killing off your kids for a better life of your own. As is shown in the upper right of this site, right now, Pope Benedict XVI states that we are considered fundamentalists for having a strong feeling for the innocent life that is murdered and wasted every day.

You can see this clip here. Nevermind the text calling Ms. Hasselbeck a “psycho.” Instead, consider the argument the other people are making. It is okay to kill another human when it benefits me, me, me. Think about that. Who is the psycho? And who, really, is the one who is making this argument hostile? The three, or the one? Call us fundamentalists. When things are going poorly in sports or society, often the road to recovery is good practice of the fundamentals.

Related posts:

  1. A warning to the liberal left via Powerline. As Powerline states, this doesn’t perfectly apply...
  2. States Plot to Block, Limit Health Care Reform Law #tcot At least 36 state legislatures so far have proposed...
  3. Political Correctness Received this via email: There is an annual contest...
  4. Bart Stupak meets his match #tcot His name is Dan Benishek. He’s a 57-year-old surgeon...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.